The contention of magnetic monopole, a hypothesize particle is an extended dilemma still under speculative stage of modern physics despite the fact that in theoretical physics some worthy assumptions have been made in support of their reality. The current state of the ongoing research in experimental high-energy physics is that the magnetic monopoles as isolated particles are yet to be detected during collisions in particle accelerators. The first person to call attention to this hypothesize particle was the late British theoretical physicist and Nobel laureate Paul Dirac in year 1931. The late professor Dirac made promulgation on this argument on the basis of quantized electric charge taking Maxwells’ equations into account while working on relativistic quantum electromagnetism where he showed that a small scale discrete charge ingenuously concedes with wave function of quantum mechanics. This led to the assumption that a particle with a single magnetic pole could be present in the universe and the present-day experimental high-energy collisions taking place in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) are focused on to unveil this holy grail of high-energy physics.
The MoEDAL (Monopole and Exotics Detector at the LHC) is the seventh high-energy physics experiment project at CERN currently going through a development phase and going to be activated in year 2011. According to CERN physicists a magnetic monopole should possess approximately 4700 times more ionizing power than any other conventional charged particle. Joseph Polchinski, a theoretical physicist attached to the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the University of California at Santa Barbara, USA says that any theoretical framework that demands charge to be quantized will do the groundwork for the presence of magnetic monopoles. But in his statement Polchinski has overlooked an important criterion that facilitates the existence of magnetic monopoles in a quantized charged environment which I am going to claim explicitly in the course of my critical analysis of this research paper and at the same time I would like to add something more to the CERN physicists assumption regarding the high ionizing power of magnetic mono-poles. Before going in to the real physics of magnetic monopole paradox of high-energy physics I must say that there is a strong viewpoint that the magnetic monopoles can resist even a massive nuclear explosion, the frame of reference that I am going to review at a later stage of this argument with an example in order to establish evidence.
Before going further deep into the theoretical axioms of this contention I would like to harness the readers’ attentiveness to the Maxwells’ equations where this whole episode of magnetic mono-pole assumed to have established its roots which I am going to review now in comparison with Quaternion atomic model of Quantum Dynamical Evolution Theory of Sanathdeva Murutenge abbreviated QDE Theory.
James Clerk Maxwell, Scottish theoretical physicist and mathematician unveiled that the engendering of electricity and magnetism are substantiations of the very phenomenon, the electromagnetic field and the electric / magnetic fields progress through vacuum space. The four sets of partial differential equations of Maxwells’ electromagnetism viz.Gauss’ Law of Electricity, Gauss’ Law of Magnetism, Faradays’ Law of Induction and Amperes’ Law recite the electric and magnetic fields to the motion of electric charges. The aforesaid laws will be fixed very concisely at appropriate places of this research paper in order to support the readers’ capacity of comprehension of this unsolved enigmatic concept of theoretical physics. Now let us see how the magnetic monopole of the universe comes exclusively in many-folds (manifold) of the electric charge and thereby to unravel the great theoretical mystery, the quantization of electric charge. To get to the bottom of this paradox I would like to harness the readers’ intentness to the Quaternion atomic model of QDE Theory.
According to this theory, the Quaternion atom is a quadruple having a four particle unit with a central vacuous space of trapped high-energy. The theory also explicates that this composite motive force of the universe originates at a higher plane beyond the perimeter of earths’ orbit and conduce to the establishment of a singular matrix therein. Therefore the singular matrix of earths’ orbital nature consists of trillions of vacuums embedded in a square matrix of elementariness. Unlike at the outset of isolated excited state of Quaternion atom where the two processes viz. spontaneous symmetry breaking of subatomic particles and asymptotic freedom of quarks take place incessantly, once the matrix is formed due to condensation thus keeping the motive force of the atoms at a lowest momentous state, the wave function of the symmetry model leap on to a different dimension. The cessations of above two phenomena are at the helm of this new diversification of electric charge at matrix level. The motion of electric charge that was confined all these time to the elemental framework of Quaternion atomic model commence to vault into the central vacuum space. This is the point where the four sets of partial differential equations of Maxwells’ electromagnetism become pragmatic. The Gauss’ law of electricity states that the electric flux out of any closed surface is proportional to the total charge enclosed within the surface. In exercising this law to an electric field of a point charge, we can explain that it is congruous with the Coulomb’s Law while the mathematical function obtained by the process of integration, the value of divergence electric field of the net charge enclosed give us the degree of consistency of the charge source. This also shed light on the principle (in this situation applicable to conservation of charge) resulting from Einstein’s special theory of relativity which combines the separate laws of the conservation of energy and mass. According to the Gauss’ law of magnetism, a flux from a point magnetic source would give a mathematical value of function by the process of integration. Here also the divergence of magnetic field is proportional to the point magnetic source. Though this second law of Gauss clearly says that there is no magnetic mono-poles in nature, we can conveniently utilize this law for our purpose of resolving the theoretical assumption of existence of magnetic mono-poles in this network of Quaternion lattice in earths’ orbital atmosphere. Finally the third and the fourth laws viz. Faradays’ law of induction and Amperes law are consistent with the Quaternion closed elemental loop along with its central enclosed area of space where the motion of electric charge takes place, generating the equals of line integrals of magnetic and electric fields. Now I think that the reader may have got a faint abstract notion of how the Quaternion atomic model of QDE Theory amass the competency of narration of Maxwells’ electromagnetism in order to resolve the contention of argument in this paper because this is a bit perplexing topic even to many internationally known theoretical high-energy physicists of the world.